Quote:
Originally Posted by Wylie's Mom
(Post 4591524)
I will contact Admin and look into this, but my guess is that there is a reason it's not this way already.
As far as resizing, most applications can make it super easy...ie, I have Photoshop (but many other apps have this also) and all I have to do when saving is select the size I want it to end up as (ie 400k, 357k, 198k, whatever...). The free ones out there supposedly have something like this as well.
What are you using, Mark, to resize your piccies? And have you tried using Picasa or anything? |
I think it was a couple years ago that I last "re-sized" a photo. I think it was just "paint", some cropping process to get them small enough to fit here or actually for a fishing forum. Besides the hassle of having to do it was the clutter of having multiple copies of the same photos in various states of "sizing" in multiple/various files .... I really didn't like that, the clutter.
So what I did, figured out, was to dummy down, select a different size(lower quality) setting on my phone camera. PHONE camera... it's crappy quality to begin with... That made it so I could download the original, not modified, photo here and at the fishing forum. The size of the photo fluctuated depending on the amount of light and color but I had selected the lowest setting so it always fit YT requirements.
So when I got interested in this new hobby, mushrooming, I reset my phone camera to a higher setting so the quality would be a little better(although not much) to assist with ID while posting photos in a mushroom ID page at facebook. Some mushrooms grow in very low light conditions, even now with the higher settings, a lot of my photos are crap. At lower settings, they are useless for ID purposes. Yes, I need to tinker with the phone camera settings to try to make it work or even better yet, carry a better camera. I don't like carrying the bigger camera on these walks with the dogs or while foraging in the woods. Even if I did, those photos would be useless here unless I re-sized them.
I recommended a similar upgrade at my favorite fishing forum, they got it done. Other fishing forums that I'm a member at, and facebook, already had the auto re-sizing.
Side note: A while back, here at YT, we had a member, a newbie(ok, newer than I), he took a bunch of photos but couldn't get them uploaded here except on the rare occasion his younger adult daughter re-sized them for him(if I recall that correctly).... he was just a guy, a wounded/disabled vet in a wheelchair with, IMO, the largest, ugliest, yorkie I had ever seen! But he was a guy with a yorkie and he loved that dog very much, and that is what I respected. He didn't communicate well on this forum, maybe typing was an issue. He referred to his trips to "the blind" as "hunting" trips and that turns some people off as well. He and his big ugly lovable yorkie were only photographing from a blind set up to be accessed with his wheel chair. The frustration of not being able to upload photos and the lack of being able to convey clearly what he was trying to say, and receiving very little interaction in return, drove him away. I'm thinking, if we had auto re-sizing then, he could have shared his photos as a better way for HIM to communicate.
So many other forums have auto re-sizing and the direct insertion of the photo into the postings, not the silly little postage stamp that must be clicked to open up another window to see the photo. What is it that keeps YT from implementing such an upgrade? Cost of data storage space, additional servers, makes the strongest argument against it. Sure would be nice!