YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community

YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   SLoW nIGht? Dumb Questions? (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/off-topic-discussions/32958-slow-night-dumb-questions.html)

bchgirl 02-24-2006 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsCeNsIoN
Why doesn't the super glue stick to the inside of the tube?

Better question....why won't super glue adhere to whatever you are trying to repair, but will glue your fingers together in 5 seconds flat?

bchgirl 02-24-2006 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fasteddie
Only since it's been 21 hours without an answer...
---
[Q] From John Branch: “I’ve heard three explanations for the term Windy City as an epithet for Chicago, Illinois: the common assumption that it refers to the winds gusting through the city (understandable to anyone who’s been there); the boasting of Chicagoans to the rest of America about the glories of their rebuilt city after the Great Fire; and the blustering of Chicago politicians to the city’s inhabitants. My guess is that the first could easily be invention after the fact, while the last is too local to account for the term’s familiarity elsewhere. What do your sources tell you?”

[A] It is indeed often said that the word windy in the name refers to the long-winded and boastful speech of Chicago politicians.

The story you will commonly find is that it dates to shortly before the great World’s Columbian Exhibition of 1893. Chicago was putting forward its claim with great verve and bombast. This really got up the nose of people in New York, which was competing with Chicago to host the exhibition. Animosity became so bad that Charles A Dana, editor of the New York Sun, wrote an editorial telling New Yorkers to pay no attention to the “nonsensical claims of that windy city. Its people could not hold a world’s fair even if they won it”. The history books tell us that Chicago did win it and did hold it (and even made a profit from it). Books also tell us that the nickname of Windy City dates from that editorial.

This story is wrong. There are several recorded instances of Chicago being called the Windy City before Mr Dana put his pen to paper. That we now have what looks like the real story is owed, as so often with American expressions, to Barry Popik, part-time parking judge and expert amateur word sleuth.

For example, he found this in the Chicago Tribune for 11 September 1886: “The name of ‘Windy City,’ which is sometimes used by village papers in New York and Michigan to designate Chicago, is intended as a tribute to the refreshing lake breezes of the great summer resort of the West, but is an awkward and rather ill-chosen expression and is doubtless misunderstood”.

It has only recently been discovered that the term appears even earlier, in a headline on the front page of the Cleveland Gazette for 19 September 1885, reporting several items of news from Chicago, particularly a judicial decision: “From the Windy City: Judge Foote’s Civil Right decision”. For the nickname to be well enough known in Cleveland that it appeared in a headline without explanation indicates that it was by 1885 getting to be an established term.

Mr Popik has suggested that the name actually originated in a scheme by the Chicago Tribune about that date to promote the city as a summer resort, using the cool breeze off the lake as the basis of its attraction. Before then, Chicago was usually nicknamed Garden City (its Latin motto was and is Urbs in Horto, “city in a garden”). There seems to have been a shift from the old name to the new in the middle 1880s.

http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-win1.htm

Nah, that's not why.... it's the hot air.....ssshhhh don't tell Stewiesmoms ;)

fasteddie 02-24-2006 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsCeNsIoN
Why doesn't the super glue stick to the inside of the tube?

Q: Why doesn't superglue stick to the inside of its tube?

A: Superglue will not stick to the inside of its tube because the tube contains oxygen in the form of air but excludes water. Oxygen inhibits whereas water catalyses.

A: Superglue doesn't stick to the inside of the tube because, being based on a cyano-acrylate monomer, it requires moisture in the form of water or some other active hydrogen-bearing compound to polymerise.

This explains why the best join between two surfaces is made using a thin glue line. An excess thickness of glue will lead to a retarded cure. This moisture sensitivity explains two things. First, why the bottle comes with a seal that's impossible to break without covering oneself in glue and why the resulting spillage adheres so well to your skin - being warm and moist, skin makes an ideal substrate.

A: The Loctite company in the US discovered the inhibition by oxygen of the otherwise rapid polymerisation of cyano-acrylate. That is why the bottle must always be left with plenty of air inside. The liquid monomer converts to solid polymer when oxygen is excluded by trapping it between close-fitting surfaces.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14820087.800.html

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsCeNsIoN
Do penguins have knees?

Do penguins have knees?

1. Yes, though they face rearward, as most birds' knees do. The knees just aren't visible under their feathers.

2. You can see in this picture : http://www.skullsunlimited.com/black...d_penguin.html that they do have knees very close to their body.

3. Penguins, in common with all birds, have a different arrangement of joints in the legs from those in mammals. However, they do have joints equivalent to our knees - the difference is that these joints are much closer to the hip than on mammals

http://www.answerbag.com/c_view.php/2380#q_12376

Also, the person that wrote the book "Do Penguins Have Knees?" states this:

Penguins DO have knees, and I can prove it. I touched a penguin's knee myself during the photo shoot for this book.

http://www.imponderables.com/do_penguins_have.php

BabyFidgette 02-24-2006 10:43 AM

I know this question is going to sound mean, but IT'S NOT!!! :D

Do people on YT have a life other than their Yorkies? I know I don't!

:lol tears

Do I wish I did? At this point, no not really. Yorkies love unconditionally. :aimeeyork

bchgirl 02-24-2006 10:54 AM

Why is a flock of crows called a murder?

AsCeNsIoN 02-25-2006 03:39 AM

LoL!!! I never expected anyone to answer me!! ROFL!! Thanks Fasteddie :D You are the fountain of all knowledge!

So penguins do have knees, thats so cool. :D Cute little wadlers :D

bugaboosmom 03-11-2006 01:52 AM

What if when we are asleep and dream that is reality and right now is just a dream?

OLIVIA_KARHIS 03-11-2006 02:24 AM

I am in germany right now (from texas) and my land lord gose wolf wolf. My bunny looks at him like he is CRAZY.

LaLoca1 03-11-2006 09:47 PM

Why can't I win the lottery?

fasteddie 03-12-2006 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bchgirl
Why is a flock of crows called a murder?

What is a group of crows called (as in "a gaggle of geese")?
The poetic term for a bunch of crows is a "murder." No scientist calls them that, only poets. Scientists would call it a flock.
[everything you ever wanted to know about crows can be found here]
http://cumv.bio.cornell.edu/mcgowan/crowfaq.htm#murder

"Flock" is correct, but only if the geese are standing around killing time. If the group of geese is flying, it becomes a "skein". If the geese are on the water, the're a "gaggle".

A "convocation" of Eagles. (Not to be confused with a convention of Eagles, who are the ones wearing hats.)
A "charm" of hummingbirds.
A "skulk" of foxes.
A "chattering" of starlings.
A "mustering" of storks.
An "unkindness" of ravens.
A "seige" of herons.
A "leap" of leopards.
A "murder" of crows.
A "sloth" of bears

Let's begin with Cub Scouts. As with geese, the group terms vary according to what the Cubs are doing. If they are meeting at someone else's house, for exmple, they are referred to as a "den". If they are meeting at your house, they are a "din" of Cub Scouts, a very important distinction, believe me! A group of den mothers, the adult leaders of Cubs, is a "frazzle". Collectively, the husbands of den mothers are "the weekly poker game."

There are different names for groups of fishermen in different situations. A group of fishemen driving out to begin a day of fishing is an "exuberance". If he day turns out to be unsuccessful, the group is variously referred to as a "sulk" or a "grumble". A group of ice fishermen is a "chatter" or a "chill", although the term "loony" is often used, particularly by wives of ice fishermen.
As a group, spouses of fishemen off on a three-day lark, or even an exaltation of larks, are variously a crash of wives, a leap of wives, and sometimes a murder of wives. Often a single wife will appear to be a whole group under these circumstances and it is all right to use the appropriate group term, if you get the chance and think it will do you any good.
Strangely, there are a few interesting group names for hunters. For example, a group of lost hunters is referred to as "a group of lost huntes," although wives will occasionally refer to such a group as a "nincompoopery". A "boast" of hunters refers to any group of hunters larger than one. A "tedium" is any group of hunters who get started talking about their first deer, first elk, or any of their other firsts, of which there are whole exaltations.

A "whiff" of skunk trappers is one of my favorite group terms, as is a "cramp" of camp cooks.
[here is a website for crow info]
www.well.com/user/crow/corvids.html
[it gets discussed on this thread]
www.bcpl.net/~tross/gnchat.html

James Lipton's "An Exaltation of Larks" is devoted to these collective nouns, many of which orignated as hunters' terms and have been in the language for centuries. Here's a gleaning from his book:
A covey of partridges
A murder of crows
A rafter of turkeys
A brood of hens
A fall of woodcocks
A dule of doves
A wedge of swans
A party of jays
A company of parrots
A colony of penguins
A cover of coots
A sord of mallards
A dissimulation of birds
A peep of chickens
A pitying of turtledoves
A paddling of ducks [on the water]
A siege of herons
A charm of finches
A skein of geese [in flight] a tidings of magpies
A cast of hawks
A deceit of lapwings
An ostentation of peacocks
A bouquet of pheasants
A congregation of plovers
An unkindness of ravens
A building of rooks
A host of sparrows
A descent of woodpeckers
A mustering of storks
A flight of swallows
A watch of nightingales
A murmuration of starlings
A spring of teal
A parliament of owls
An exaltation of larks

From: http://p098.ezboard.com/fwordorigins...icID=300.topic

fasteddie 03-12-2006 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bugaboosmom
What if when we are asleep and dream that is reality and right now is just a dream?

That's much too complex for my puny brain! ;)

alaskayorkie 03-12-2006 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fasteddie
What is a group of crows called (as in "a gaggle of geese")?
The poetic term for a bunch of crows is a "murder." No scientist calls them that, only poets. Scientists would call it a flock.
[everything you ever wanted to know about crows can be found here]
http://cumv.bio.cornell.edu/mcgowan/crowfaq.htm#murder

"Flock" is correct, but only if the geese are standing around killing time. If the group of geese is flying, it becomes a "skein". If the geese are on the water, the're a "gaggle".

A "convocation" of Eagles. (Not to be confused with a convention of Eagles, who are the ones wearing hats.)
A "charm" of hummingbirds.
A "skulk" of foxes.
A "chattering" of starlings.
A "mustering" of storks.
An "unkindness" of ravens.
A "seige" of herons.
A "leap" of leopards.
A "murder" of crows.
A "sloth" of bears

Let's begin with Cub Scouts. As with geese, the group terms vary according to what the Cubs are doing. If they are meeting at someone else's house, for exmple, they are referred to as a "den". If they are meeting at your house, they are a "din" of Cub Scouts, a very important distinction, believe me! A group of den mothers, the adult leaders of Cubs, is a "frazzle". Collectively, the husbands of den mothers are "the weekly poker game."

There are different names for groups of fishermen in different situations. A group of fishemen driving out to begin a day of fishing is an "exuberance". If he day turns out to be unsuccessful, the group is variously referred to as a "sulk" or a "grumble". A group of ice fishermen is a "chatter" or a "chill", although the term "loony" is often used, particularly by wives of ice fishermen.
As a group, spouses of fishemen off on a three-day lark, or even an exaltation of larks, are variously a crash of wives, a leap of wives, and sometimes a murder of wives. Often a single wife will appear to be a whole group under these circumstances and it is all right to use the appropriate group term, if you get the chance and think it will do you any good.
Strangely, there are a few interesting group names for hunters. For example, a group of lost hunters is referred to as "a group of lost huntes," although wives will occasionally refer to such a group as a "nincompoopery". A "boast" of hunters refers to any group of hunters larger than one. A "tedium" is any group of hunters who get started talking about their first deer, first elk, or any of their other firsts, of which there are whole exaltations.

A "whiff" of skunk trappers is one of my favorite group terms, as is a "cramp" of camp cooks.
[here is a website for crow info]
www.well.com/user/crow/corvids.html
[it gets discussed on this thread]
www.bcpl.net/~tross/gnchat.html

James Lipton's "An Exaltation of Larks" is devoted to these collective nouns, many of which orignated as hunters' terms and have been in the language for centuries. Here's a gleaning from his book:
A covey of partridges
A murder of crows
A rafter of turkeys
A brood of hens
A fall of woodcocks
A dule of doves
A wedge of swans
A party of jays
A company of parrots
A colony of penguins
A cover of coots
A sord of mallards
A dissimulation of birds
A peep of chickens
A pitying of turtledoves
A paddling of ducks [on the water]
A siege of herons
A charm of finches
A skein of geese [in flight] a tidings of magpies
A cast of hawks
A deceit of lapwings
An ostentation of peacocks
A bouquet of pheasants
A congregation of plovers
An unkindness of ravens
A building of rooks
A host of sparrows
A descent of woodpeckers
A mustering of storks
A flight of swallows
A watch of nightingales
A murmuration of starlings
A spring of teal
A parliament of owls
An exaltation of larks

From: http://p098.ezboard.com/fwordorigins...icID=300.topic

The answer man lives! And a witty reply to boot. Thanks FE, you da answa man.

fasteddie 03-12-2006 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaLoca1
Why can't I win the lottery?

Hopefully you aren't spending as much as the lady here, because by NOT playing you may be able to amass a small fortune and your odds of this small fortune may be decidedly better!
---
For the past five years, 23-year old Amber Aase has bought California lottery tickets, spending $10 to $20 a week. Sometimes $30 a day when the jackpot got gigantic -- or the dream got desperate.

"It's always when I don't have the money that I actually play, hoping that I'm going to double my money, so that I have money to pay bills and get ahead."

If you add it all up -- $10 to $20 a week for 5 years -- Amber invested more than $3,100 in the lottery. She estimates her winnings at $300. That's a $2,800 loss! We asked financial planner Carol Van Bruggen how Amber could have done better for herself.

This graph shows what Amber's same $3,100 investment would have given her had she put her money in the stock market -- in a basic mutual fund with a minimal 12% rate of return.

"Over a five-year period of time, she actually would have had $4,088. But what's amazing is: if she continued to do this, she would have...almost $312,000 by the age of 50."

But Amber is not convinced, even when we show her the astounding long-term pay off.

"I need to put money away. I agree, and this is a good way to do it. But what if I win on this one in my pocket?"

We wish you luck, Amber. Not on your lottery tickets, but when you create your own winning ticket -- with your investments!

http://www.pbs.org/moneymoves/hot_to...3/numbers.html

MeganS 03-12-2006 12:32 PM

this is funny! here's one...

why do we park in the driveway and drive on the parkway? that has always confused me.....:rolleyes:

fasteddie 03-12-2006 03:25 PM

Why do we drive on the parkway and park on the driveway?

19-Jun-1987

Dear Cecil:

Please answer this question--I've been lying awake nights just wondering. Why do we drive on the parkway and park in the driveway? --Deidra N., Baltimore

Dear Deidra:

Believe it or not, this is the third time I've gotten this question in as many months. It must be the sunspots.

Let's get one thing cleared up right off the bat: you can drive on the driveway. Indeed, if you'll permit me to wax philosophical for a moment, this is the very essence of drivewayness--to enable you to drive from the street to your garage. Moreover, you can park on the parkway, if you're willing to risk the wrath of the law. I don't know that this clarifies things much, but it seemed like a point worth making.

I think the crux of the issue, however--I love using words like crux--is the dual meaning of "park."

Park in the sense of tended greenery and park in the sense of stowing your vehicle, though deriving from the same root, diverged in meaning long ago. In Old French, a parc was an enclosure. To this day a military park means an area where vehicles are stored and serviced. As early as 1812 there was a verb "to park," meaning to store one's howitzers in a military park. This carried over to carriages and ultimately to any sort of vehicle.

Our notion of landscaped parks, meanwhile, derives from the medieval practice of enclosing game preserves for the use of the aristocracy. The term was later applied to the grounds around a country estate, then to royal parks in London to which the proles were grudgingly admitted, and finally to any landscaped public grounds. The idea of enclosure is still evident in expressions like "ball park," for an enclosed playing field. Any more questions, smart stuff?

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_080.html


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168