![]() |
Heres the story of a Hurricane! Here's the Story of a Hurricane > > > >In 2001, the Federal Emergency Management Agency ranked a major hurricane > >strike on New Orleans as "among the three likeliest, most catastrophic > >disasters facing this country," directly behind a terrorist strike on New > >York City. Yesterday, disaster struck. One of the strongest storms in > >recorded history rocked the Gulf Coast, bringing 145 mph winds and floods > >of up to 20 feet. One million residents were evacuated; at least 65 are > >confirmed dead. Tens of thousands of homes were completely submerged. > >Mississippi's governor reported "catastrophic damage on all levels." > >Downtown New Orleans buildings were "imploding," a fire chief said. Oil > >surged past $70 a barrel. New Orleanians were grimly asking each other, > >"So, where did you used to live?" (To donate to Red Cross disaster relief, > >click here or call 1-800-HELP-NOW). While it happened, President Bush > >decided to ... continue his vacation, stopping by the Pueblo El Mirage RV > >and Golf Resort in El Mirage, California, to hawk his Medicare drug benefit > >plan. On Sunday, President Bush said, "I want to thank all the folks at the > >federal level and the state level and the local level who have taken this > >storm seriously." He's not one of them. Below, the Progress Report presents > >"How Not to Prepare for a Massive Hurricane," by President Bush, > >congressional conservatives, and their corporate special interest allies. > > > >SLASH SPENDING ON HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS IN NEW ORLEANS: Two months ago, > >President Bush took an ax to budget funds that would have helped New > >Orleans prepare for such a disaster. The New Orleans branch of the U.S. > >Army Corps of Engineers suffered a "record $71.2 million" reduction in > >federal funding, a 44.2 percent reduction from its 2001 levels. Reports at > >the time said that thanks to the cuts, "major hurricane and flood > >protection projects will not be awarded to local engineering firms. ... > >Also, a study to determine ways to protect the region from a Category 5 > >hurricane has been shelved for now." (Too bad Louisiana isn't a swing > >state. In the aftermath of Hurricane Frances -- and the run-up to the 2004 > >election -- the Bush administration awarded $31 million in disaster relief > >to Florida residents who didn't even experience hurricane damage.) > > > >DESTROY NATURAL HURRICANE PROTECTIONS: The Gulf Coast wetlands form a > >"natural buffer that helps protect New Orleans from storms," slowing > >hurricanes down as they approach from sea. When he came into office, > >President Bush pledged to uphold the "no net loss" wetland policy his > >father initiated. He didn't keep his word. Bush rolled back tough wetland > >policies set by the Clinton administration, ordering federal agencies "to > >stop protecting as many as 20 million acres of wetlands and an untold > >number of waterways nationwide." Last year, four environmental groups > >issued a joint report showing that administration policies had allowed > >"developers to drain thousands of acres of wetlands." The result? New > >Orleans may be in even greater danger: "Studies show that if the wetlands > >keep vanishing over the next few decades, then you won't need a giant storm > >to devastate New Orleans -- a much weaker, more common kind of hurricane > >could destroy the city too." > > > >GUT THE AGENCY TASKED WITH DEVELOPING HURRICANE RESPONSES: Forward-thinking > >federal plans with titles like "Issues and Options in Flood Hazards > >Management," "Floods: A National Policy Concern," and "A Framework for > >Flood Hazards Management" would be particularly valuable in a time of > >increasingly intense hurricanes. Unfortunately, the agency that used to > >produce them -- the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) -- was gutted by > >Gingrich conservatives several years ago. As Chris Mooney (who presciently > >warned of the need to bulk up hurricane defenses in New Orleans last May) > >noted yesterday, "If we ever return to science-based policymaking based on > >professionalism and expertise, rather than ideology, an office like OTA > >would be very useful in studying how best to save a city like New Orleans > >-- and how Congress might consider appropriating money to achieve this > >end." > > > >SEND OUR FIRST RESPONDERS TO FIGHT A WAR OF CHOICE: National Guard and > >Reserve soldiers are typically on the front lines responding to disasters > >like Katrina -- that is, if they're not fighting in Iraq. Roughly 35 > >percent of Louisiana's National Guard is currently deployed in Iraq, where > >guardsmen and women make up about four of every 10 soldiers. Additionally, > >"Dozens of high water vehicles, humvees, refuelers and generators" used by > >the Louisiana Guard are also tied up abroad. "The National Guard needs that > >equipment back home to support the homeland security mission," Louisiana > >National Guard Lt. Colonel Pete Schneider told reporters earlier this > >month. "Recruitment is down dramatically, mostly because prospective > >recruits are worried about deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan or another > >country," the AP reported recently. "I used to be able to get about eight > >people a month," said National Guard 1st Sgt. Derick Young, a New Orleans > >recruiter. "Now, I'm lucky if I can get one." > > > >HELP FUEL GLOBAL WARMING: Severe weather occurrences like hurricanes and > >heat waves already take hundreds of lives and cause millions in damages > >each year. As the Progress Report has noted, data increasingly suggest that > >human-induced global warming is making these phenomena more dangerous and > >extreme than ever. "The hurricane that struck Louisiana yesterday was > >nicknamed Katrina by the National Weather Service," science author Ross > >Gelbspan writes. "Its real name is global warming." AP reported recently on > >a Massachusetts Institute of Technology analysis that shows that "major > >storms spinning in both the Atlantic and the Pacific ... have increased in > >duration and intensity by about 50 percent" since the 1970s, trends that > >are "closely linked to increases in the average temperatures of the ocean > >surface and also correspond to increases in global average atmospheric > >temperatures during the same period." Yet just last week, as Katrina was > >gathering steam and looming over the Gulf, the Bush administration released > >new CAFE standards that actually encourage automakers to produce bigger, > >less fuel efficient vehicles, while preventing states from taking strong, > >progressive action to reverse global warming. > > __________________________________________________ _______________ ----- |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use