| Lorraine | 01-18-2007 09:25 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvMySissy I know there have been threads before, but Sissy just came from the vet where I asked about microchipping. Our vet's office does not offer it as a service because there are three different companies offering chipping who all use different scanners. The vet said that unless your baby is picked up by a facility that uses the same scanning equipment as your chip that it won't make a difference.
She said all her babies are tatooed on the inner thigh, with a national registry and this is what she recommends. However, they have to be anesthetized for this.
Sissy has an extra baby tooth still on the bottom (with the adult tooth as well). If it doesn't fall out on its own within the next month, it will have to be extracted and she will be under anesthesia for that. I think if this occurs I will have her tatooed also.
Any other opinions on this??
| I don't like microchips for that reason and I know of too many that have migrated. I also don't like the idea of this foreign body although tiny, placed under the skin.
I have tattooed puppies every since I started breeding. Under Canadian Kennel Club rules a puppy must be identified before leaving a breeder either with a tattoo or microchip and it must be in place before an individual puppy is registered as the ID is recorded on the registration paper.
There are breeders in my area that do wonderful tattoos for other breeders, they are quick, readable tattoo's and the puppy is not sedated. takes less than a minute when the person knows how to do it. It is not done the same as human tattoos. | 