| SoCalyorkiLvr | 01-03-2006 03:35 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by PlatinumYorkies Irene, I am glad that you take stock in that..However, I feel that if you aren't s/n your own animals, or vaccinating them..Continuing the preaching, and the shoving of the same info on folks who s/n and vaccinate then you are trying to push your beliefs on others, not share an opinion! Sorry, but that is JMHO on the whole thing. | What about those of us who don't believe in routine s/n? Are you not pushing your views on us when whenever you call us "irresponsible"?
I specifically phrase my posts to make sure that no one thought I was pushing my views on anyone, I was merely giving people some food for thought and asking them to make their own educated decisiosn on what is best for their beloved pet. I even said that sometimes neutering IS best for the animal. It depends on the situation.
I don't think you read my posts carefully enough if you feel I am "pushing my beliefs onto others" any more than the pro "routine s/n" members are. I haven't called anyone lazy, insensitive, uncaring, irresponsible, or stupid for neutering their pet, but I feel that in some instances, this is the case.
They would rather not bother with the hassle of the heats and the leg lifting and being responsible enough to supervise and to provide adequate containment to prevent unwanted pregnancy so they take the "easy way out for them" and have the poor dog's God given parts removed permanently. That should be considered cruel and even criminal in my book. I mean if we are supposed to be looking out for the best interests of our pets, how can routine neutering be in their best interests when they could have a tubal ligation or vasectomy or be responsible and contain them like responsible pet owners should? |