YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community

YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Yorkshire Terrier Discussion (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/general-yorkshire-terrier-discussion/)
-   -   Here we go again, and again... (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/general-yorkshire-terrier-discussion/226770-here-we-go-again-again.html)

Baroness 04-28-2011 07:05 AM

How sad. I wonder sometimes what goes through owners minds when they cannot keep a leash on a dog and teach them obedience when they are a breed that is known to have issues. I had a run in with a pitbull a few years ago. I was walking my pom in my neighborhood, listening to my zune, and something made me look off to my right at a retaining wall. Here comes a pit bull galloping at me full speed ahead. I pulled up on sarge's leash and he flew up into my arms, I turned my back to the PB and yelled NO! He jumped up at my back trying to get to sarge and I kicked out and yelled NO again, he ran off. I stopped taking walks with sarge there...scared the bejeebies out of me. I held sarge all the way home and jogged most of the way.

When I first got my lab he scared me, he was 4 already and he's got a huge head like the biggest rottie. (We adopted him from a deploying soldier) He's the sweetest dog, but I know he has some bite power. Thankfully his owner trained him well and taught us the commands to keep Balance in line. Still I wouldn't trust my old man with a child. His teeth and head size are mammoth and he's never been around little one's. I was kinda surprised to see labs in some of the articles, but...logically thinking I'm guessing the larger specimens of the breed could be in the mix.

moshes_human 04-28-2011 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil Sis (Post 3515931)

I used to sort of feel that way about dobies, but I have a friend who breeds dobies and I see that (if breed correctly) they are a great dogs. I let them play with my guys with supervision (very close supervision) because you just never know. She has a very hard time selling her pup (used to get $3000 per dog-- show quality) because many people don't want the added expense of the extra home owners insurance and other issue of having a dog that is perceived as aggressive



I watched a show on pitt bull rescue on tv-- they were talking about a gene that makes the pitt bulls very aggressive (if I remember correctly it showed up in blue markings?) so it is a breeding problem. And like already said-- the wrong people breed the wrong type of dog for the wrong reasons and we all suffer and the wrong dogs suffer.


That is exactly why my parents got out of Breeding Dobermans. What awesome dogs!!

As far as the blue gene....I really don't know. My Father in Law dogs are reddish/white with red noses and Sable was white with a red nose.

I don't particularly like Catahoula or Akita dogs as I have been attacked by both, but it doesn't mean I think they should be banned. I was also charged by a Cujo (SP?) looking Saint Bernard once (VERY VERY SCARY)...however Brandi our Doberman was with me and stood "our" ground. The Saint Bernard stood and barked at us but didn't come any closer. Brandi would have protected me with her life, and it would have taken her life if that massive dog had attacked.. I was only about 12 at the time. The dogs "owner" and I use that term loosely, finally came out of his house and got his dog. I never saw that dog again. My parents were so relieved we had her. I know if the same thing happened my Father in Laws dogs would do the same. Pits are very loyal and brave.

yorkietalkjilly 04-28-2011 07:39 AM

I don't know about the creds of this site but this is interesting:

U.S. Dog Bite Statistics - DogsBite.org

See the Home page, too. It is such a shame irresponsible people allow this to go on and on.

FlDebra 04-28-2011 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Britster (Post 3515540)

Brit -- that article and its supposed LIST is a CROCK! Talk about trying to twist the facts around -- that group does it!("The information here comes from the Responsible Dog Owners Of The Western States (RDOWS) , which has just updated the list of breeds that have been banned or restricted in the U.S.") They do say that there are 2 ways to get on the list, either by name or by description! So, somewhere there is a description of pitt bulls that these people have very broadly decided also encompasses pugs, sharpeis, terriers and you name it! That is just ridiculous. I think any sensible person knows the description was never meant to include all the breeds they put on their list! You are sharper than to fall for that article!

FlDebra 04-28-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkieusa (Post 3515666)
Banning worked here - like a charm!:) They've been banned here for 24 years, if I remember correctly. Bad memory.:) No more attacks have happened. Just the occasional dog bite that doesn't amount to more than broken skin.

Yay for Kansas! I wish we had more courageous enough to ban or at least enforce spay & neuter!

FlDebra 04-28-2011 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ellie May (Post 3515662)
Ontario's pit bull ban did very little good and now they are kinda backed into a corner. What now, ban the breed that they assume has the next highest bite potential?

Pit bull ban hasn?t cut dog bites - thestar.com

I.

By the way -- you omitted "BY MUCH" after "hasn't cut dog bites." in the quote. The number of dog bites has gone down, just not as much as desired! It takes a while. Remember Ontario did not move all the pit bulls out! The ones already there were supposed to be spayed & neutered and muzzled. But they ARE still there! So, the first 5 years are NOT going to show a huge reduction. But as they start enforcing the spay & neuter, the number of pit bulls will slowly go down and so will the number of serious dog bites.

Remember what I said about statistics showing about anything you want them to? This is an example. sure the numbers have not gone down much yet -- but NEITHER has the actual pit bull population. You have to give the law time to really make a difference in the numbers of pit bulls walking around! Another question would be just how much enforcement has gone along with the law change?

Ellie May 04-28-2011 08:01 AM

So to those who think that we should ban "pit bulls", exactly what breeds are you wanting banned?

FlDebra 04-28-2011 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkietalkjilly (Post 3515988)
I don't know about the creds of this site but this is interesting:

U.S. Dog Bite Statistics - DogsBite.org

See the Home page, too. It is such a shame irresponsible people allow this to go on and on.

That is a very telling article. I am especially interested in the numbers that have to do with fatalities. That is where the real difference comes in. Any dog can bite but only a few can kill (for the most part -- I know there are always exceptions to the rule).

BTW -- I apologize for the last post I made where the poster was just quoting the headline! The actual article said the number of dog bites had not gone down BY MUCH but the headline chose to shorten it for affect. Another slanting of the truth for the effect desired!

Deuce 04-28-2011 08:11 AM

Sorry, I'm terrible with statistics...Can someone explain how they got these numbers?
80% of attacks that induce bodily harm
70% of attacks to children
83% of attack to adults
69% of attacks that result in fatalities
75% that result in maiming
How can you have both 70% to kids then have another 83% to adults? Honest question, I'm not sure how they're doing their numbers...

PS...someone please define "pit bull", if you mean dogs that are used in the dog fighting rings, yes I agree, ban that "sport" and put down the dogs used in those rings. As sad as that is, but they may not be aggressive towards humans but they were trained to fight and it would only be a matter of time before the dog got out of control. But many of these disgusting humans that fight dogs for $$ don't have a specific breed, they call their dogs "pit bulls" because the dogs are fighting in the "pits". If you mean all bull dogs, well good luck with that...people that own their $2500 English Bullys aren't going to go down quiet. If you're talking American Staffs, I've met too many friendly ones to say they're no good.
I don't see the point to banning breeds, people are still going to own them. They'll just call them a "lab mix" and go on about their business.

Punish the deed, not the breed!

moshes_human 04-28-2011 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deuce (Post 3516021)
Sorry, I



I don't see the point to banning breeds, people are still going to own them. They'll just call them a "lab mix" and go on about their business.

Punish the deed, not the breed!

That is what they do here. We have a ban on "pits" so people just say their dog is a Stafford or some other breed, or a mix...no one really questions it.

The funny thing is that last two attacks we had weren't by pits at all.

Britster 04-28-2011 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlDebra (Post 3515991)
Brit -- that article and its supposed LIST is a CROCK! Talk about trying to twist the facts around -- that group does it!("The information here comes from the Responsible Dog Owners Of The Western States (RDOWS) , which has just updated the list of breeds that have been banned or restricted in the U.S.") They do say that there are 2 ways to get on the list, either by name or by description! So, somewhere there is a description of pitt bulls that these people have very broadly decided also encompasses pugs, sharpeis, terriers and you name it! That is just ridiculous. I think any sensible person knows the description was never meant to include all the breeds they put on their list! You are sharper than to fall for that article!

I'm not sure where you are getting that it's a load of crock. I admit, I didn't do any deep searching but that list is on multiple dog forums. I'm going to go search now to find out more info. I could not find anything about it being "fake" on Google, and usually snopes would have something. I believe they are simply saying that this list of dog breeds are banned SOMEWHERE. An apartment complex in, say, California, may have Pugs banned, etc. Irregardless, it just proves how ridiculous BSL really is and you can't just naturally assume your breed is "safe". Ban one breed, you're allowing them to be able to ban any breed they want for any reason.

I posted this above but everyone that is for BSL seemed to pass by some of the facts I posted. In the ten years since the Dangerous Dogs Act banned the last 4 dogs in the UK (Fila, PB 'type', Dogo Argentino and Japanese Tosa) dog bites have increased by 50%. Clearly... something is NOT working.

We don't wipe out or ban the German's because Hitler was a terrible man.
So why is it any different for dogs? Thanks to BYBers and puppy millers, Golden Retrievers have been on the rise over the last decade or so for dog bites. However, subjecting them to BSL would be... idiotic, right? A knee jerk reaction to a HUGE problem that can not just be fixed by banning them.

I saw this posted somewhere else and totally agree:
Why don't you just go ahead and ban all black people? After all, black people are the cause of violent crime and it's well known that having a group of black people around means that sooner or later, someone is going to get killed, because that's what they do. Black people are vicious killers and are a menace to society.

See how dumb that sounds? Now just replace black person with pit bull.

I don't particularly like Jack Russel Terriers. Most of them I meet are annoying, barky, hyper spazzes who constantly start trouble and get into fights. That's my generalization of them from all the ones I've had experienced with (and lived with). I've only met one JRT that I liked. So because I've had bad experiences with them, I'm going to support that they all be banned? No... that would be silly.

moshes_human 04-28-2011 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Britster (Post 3516038)
I'm not sure where you are getting that it's a load of crock. I admit, I didn't do any deep searching but that list is on multiple dog forums. I'm going to go search now to find out more info. I could not find anything about it being "fake" on Google, and usually snopes would have something. I believe they are simply saying that this list of dog breeds are banned SOMEWHERE. An apartment complex in, say, California, may have Pugs banned, etc. Irregardless, it just proves how ridiculous BSL really is and you can't just naturally assume your breed is "safe". Ban one breed, you're allowing them to be able to ban any breed they want for any reason.

I posted this above but everyone that is for BSL seemed to pass by some of the facts I posted. In the ten years since the Dangerous Dogs Act banned the last 4 dogs in the UK (Fila, PB 'type', Dogo Argentino and Japanese Tosa) dog bites have increased by 50%. Clearly... something is NOT working.

We don't wipe out or ban the German's because Hitler was a terrible man.
So why is it any different for dogs? Thanks to BYBers and puppy millers, Golden Retrievers have been on the rise over the last decade or so for dog bites. However, subjecting them to BSL would be... idiotic, right? A knee jerk reaction to a HUGE problem that can not just be fixed by banning them.

I saw this posted somewhere else and totally agree:
Why don't you just go ahead and ban all black people? After all, black people are the cause of violent crime and it's well known that having a group of black people around means that sooner or later, someone is going to get killed, because that's what they do. Black people are vicious killers and are a menace to society.

See how dumb that sounds? Now just replace black person with pit bull.

I don't particularly like Jack Russel Terriers. Most of them I meet are annoying, barky, hyper spazzes who constantly start trouble and get into fights. That's my generalization of them from all the ones I've had experienced with (and lived with). I've only met one JRT that I liked. So because I've had bad experiences with them, I'm going to support that they all be banned? No... that would be silly.

:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thum bup::thumbup:

yorkietalkjilly 04-28-2011 08:28 AM

Probably they will have to ban anything with pitbull in its breed description or DNA. Not saying it is fair but action is necessary. Just because something is hard to do doesn't excuse society and caring people from starting to address it somehow - or else we keep having stories of the type that started this thread.

I think the quicker way to get results is to go after the dog fighers who breed fighters and the people who own a dog that attacks. When you go after the person responsible and start to jail them, they tend to see the light. If we have to pay more in taxes to build more jails/hire jailers and police because people will breed and keep dangerous dogs, then we have to do it or see maybe our own child or dog killed by one of these dogs.

I know at our Animal Control Shelter, the vast majority of them are pitbulls and the rest largely bully breeds. I guess many people just cannot control these big, strong dogs. Our AC Director told me that when they call owners to pick up their dog, most of the pitbull and bully breed owners refuse. We have to do something if we care about the victims and future victims and the endless killing of these poor dogs standing in all those cages across America.

Deuce 04-28-2011 08:29 AM

Also, I know that the victim usually isn't at fault when attacked by a dog. But PARENTS need to teach their kids how to approach strange dogs. I was walking my lab/shep mix one night, a big 95 lb white loveable polar bear :), and a kid, no older than 3/4 y/o (I don't know with kids, dont have them) comes running up and jumps on Max to give him a hug. Lucky for the kid Max was such a friendly giant, as that could have been a tragedy if the child ran up to the wrong dog. And I'm not saying a "pit bull" per say would have attacked the kid, but he could have run up to a yorkie and got bit...
Parents definelty need to take charge and teach their kids to stay away from strange dogs, and if the dog is with the owner to ask if its friendly and if they can pet it. Then the owner of the large/small dog can say yes/no. I'd probably almost always say no, just because if the dog, lab mix/boxer/rottie/yorkie/shih tzu/pug/etc. were to have a moment of stupidity and nip the kid, then I'm liable for it. And most likely would have to put my beloved pet down.
Just sayin...I wish parents would really get more involved in teaching their kids respect of people and animals. I know there are many many many instances where the dogs were out running wild and then attacked because the kid/adult were at the wrong place wrong time, but for those cases where kids put their hands through a fence and don't expect to get bit...those ones really peeve me because now that dog has to be put down for "defending its territory".
Sorry...ranting done.

Lil Sis 04-28-2011 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Britster (Post 3516038)
I'm not sure where you are getting that it's a load of crock. I admit, I didn't do any deep searching but that list is on multiple dog forums. I'm going to go search now to find out more info. I could not find anything about it being "fake" on Google, and usually snopes would have something. I believe they are simply saying that this list of dog breeds are banned SOMEWHERE. An apartment complex in, say, California, may have Pugs banned, etc. Irregardless, it just proves how ridiculous BSL really is and you can't just naturally assume your breed is "safe". Ban one breed, you're allowing them to be able to ban any breed they want for any reason.

I posted this above but everyone that is for BSL seemed to pass by some of the facts I posted. In the ten years since the Dangerous Dogs Act banned the last 4 dogs in the UK (Fila, PB 'type', Dogo Argentino and Japanese Tosa) dog bites have increased by 50%. Clearly... something is NOT working.

We don't wipe out or ban the German's because Hitler was a terrible man.
So why is it any different for dogs? Thanks to BYBers and puppy millers, Golden Retrievers have been on the rise over the last decade or so for dog bites. However, subjecting them to BSL would be... idiotic, right? A knee jerk reaction to a HUGE problem that can not just be fixed by banning them.

I saw this posted somewhere else and totally agree:
Why don't you just go ahead and ban all black people? After all, black people are the cause of violent crime and it's well known that having a group of black people around means that sooner or later, someone is going to get killed, because that's what they do. Black people are vicious killers and are a menace to society.

See how dumb that sounds? Now just replace black person with pit bull.

I don't particularly like Jack Russel Terriers. Most of them I meet are annoying, barky, hyper spazzes who constantly start trouble and get into fights. That's my generalization of them from all the ones I've had experienced with (and lived with). I've only met one JRT that I liked. So because I've had bad experiences with them, I'm going to support that they all be banned? No... that would be silly.

Sorry my friend.. but I find this post very offensive!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168