yorkiegold | 09-17-2005 07:20 AM | Quote:
Originally Posted by feminvstr Cj I dont understand you arguing a point that is a fact here. There are two local kennels I have use of their champion studs (proven and tested) and that have sired several champions!!!!! why would you assume these kennels are not testing their studs, paying the same amount for finishing their AKC and why are you dismissing the pedigree if you think the championship is so vital to a breeding program...you make no sense! You state many serious breeders ship their bitches as do many serious breeder have flown in AI which is far less stress on the bitch and 90% effective in a breeding.
A champion is a champion is a champion if he is in the top 20 in the country then perhaps they can command the higher dollar but a AKC champion doesnt mean his sperm is gold!!
Finally why would you make a statement that some breeders breed to what ever is handy IT IS NOT a GUARANTEE a Champion sire will produce even one potential champion in a breeding. Ill bet more than a few AKC champions are a product of a non champion sire and dam breeding through out the country. | Didn't dismiss the pedigree. Only amateurs count the percentage of "red". Far more important to know the individuals in your pedigree and what they've produced whether they're champions or not. Champions in the pedigree tell me that the breeders are testing their puppies in the show ring and they're serious about producing better dogs. They're definitely not in it just for the money. I've seen some very crappy dogs finish their championship. All I was dismissing was the 90% red comment. That's only good as a sales point with potential puppy buyers who don't know any better.
You can't tell me anything about AI. Been there done that. However, it's not natural and there are many breeders who won't do it. That's not what we were talking about. I know you've done a lot of reading, Kim.
Talk about not making sense. You said that a champion is a champion, BUT if they're in the top 20, then maybe they can charge more. So you're admitting that some dogs command a higher stud fee because of their show record. So some ARE worth more?
Using the handiest stud is not good breeding practice whether he's a champion or not. Most good breeders study pedigrees, go to dog shows and meet the upcoming youngsters and make their decisions based on many things and consider the stud fee last.
I still maintain that using your dog as a stud dog is fraught with risk and hassle and a fee should be set that takes that into account.
"Traditionally" is the word I used that seems to have thrown you off of my point. The practice of charging a stud fee equal to cost of the progeny is traditional in the sense that it has been that way for hundreds of years. May not be that way in the year 2005 in Portland, Oregon. If you can get a great "deal" then go for it. Why are you being so defensive?
CJ |