| Nancy1999 | 03-09-2009 12:58 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogie Man
(Post 2511303)
I think it's pretty well agreed that the USDA inspectors are the people 'on the scene'. And it's also agreed that they can do little except write citations. Are they prevented from reporting what they see to other agencies that could do something? Whether any of us agree on any bills that are being written in states, it does seem like enforcement is the problem with the laws already on the books and would likely be with any new laws. It seems like maybe it should be 'lobbied' (probably a bad term) for the USDA to have the authority to shut down immediately any operation and call in local authorities in the case of gross violations. We're all concerned about shutting down puppy mills and it just seems to use the USDA as the spearpoint would be the easiest, most practical way to do it. It's just a thought...any opinions?
| I'm beginning to think the USDA is more concerned with helping the farmer, become a better farmer than being a law enforcement agency, or animal welfare agency. As someone who totally supports the constitution, and the Bill of Rights, I've very uncomfortable with the government having the authority you speak of. As harmful as it is, due process is a wonderful part of our constitution. Perhaps, requiring USDA officials to report abuses, to local officials might help, but I have a feeling only the most extreme abuses would be reported.
Does anyone know if a breeder has to be registered with the USDA? I'm wondering if many would just choose not to register, if they thought the USDA had any real power. Here in AZ, there is just a $25.00 fine if you are required to register as a kennel and don't. That isn't enough incentive to get someone to register, closing down a kennel seems to be a viable option, but often they just pop up under a new name. | 