Quote:
Originally Posted by Woogie Man  You're missing the point. An owner that just decides to breed their dog could easily sell a puppy with health problems out of ignorance. This is less likely to happen from a breeder, at least an honest one. The owner is responsible in maintaining the pup's health but you shouldn't be put in the position of buying an unhealthy puppy. The knowledge a breeder SHOULD have makes it less likely tho issues can arise even with an ethical breeder. If that were to occur, a breeder should stand behind the health of the puppy. Do you really think that would happen with an owner that just bred their dog with no real thought or intent? If you want to debate fairly, at least get real. There is no iron-clad guarantee with any living thing that a health issue won't arise. It's how it's handled that makes the difference. Breeders are at least aware of the potential whereas someone just breeding their dog casually (generally) is ignorant of it. |
I am debating fairly. I simply don't agree with this point. Both litters are deemed healthy and that means both are contributing to population.