It's not the fault of the buyer if a puppy arrives at 7 months with two tumours on his chin and a bad temperment towards other dogs. The buyer informed the breeder that she owned two other dogs. I never posted anything about the looks of the dog.He's a pet, looks aren't a issue. Yes, I was ripped off but it isn't about looks or money that upsets me. At 7 months when this pup arrived I had nothing to do with his temperment or tumours, nor awful condition he was in. Yes, I was conned by the breeder but she never sent a health guarentee or contract as promised. Then again she lied about everything. I don't understand why all of you think that this breeder is faultless.
I have been working with him since he arrived here. I still have to separate him from my MiKi because he almost killed him twice. The Chin is larger and can hold his own with Mr. Vicious Yorkie. This isn't what anyone who's up front with a breeder about home and other pets expects. He brought grief to our home, no joy. Where does it come off that a deceived buyer is more responsible then a so called paragon of a breeder and takes responsibilty for the nasty Yorkie she got stuck with. He is in better condition now then when he arrived. Praise her to the hilt but I will tell the facts until my last breathe. Why should another buyer be her victim. You are all breeders and I understand the loyalty among you, especially those that own her dogs. I wouldn't buy a dog that had her lines or Fonda's in them.
Last edited by prettypuppypink; 01-10-2007 at 08:23 AM.
|