View Single Post
Old 12-18-2006, 08:02 AM   #23
Dina_Nichole
I Love My Munchkins!
Donating Member
 
Dina_Nichole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: My Babies ♥'s!
Posts: 8,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikki+2
I think 99.9% of members of this board are against the term tea cup (which I don't even think the OP used) and are against breeding strictly for little pups but to make a blanket statement that you cannot have a healthy yorkie under 4 lbs is very offensive and absolutely not true. I have 3 yorkies in my home.
Gracie, 9lbs has mild LP and reverse sneezing
Spike, 4 lbs perfectly healthy
Sugar 2.7 lbs has never had one single health issue

My mom has 2 yorkies
Alfie, 6 lbs severe reverse sneezing and probably developing LP
Sophie, 3 lbs perfectly healthy

I don't see our little yorkies health as an exception to the rule. They prove the rule that responsible, respected breeders produce healthy dogs even though occasionally some pups turn out smaller than expected. I know that there are plenty of irresponsible breeders breeding strictly for tinies and not health- surprise! Unhealthy puppies. That is just absolutely not the case with all little yorkies.

Thank you! I loved your reply I also love how she put that you wouldn't want a 90 lb. adult human?? That cracks me up. I just happen to weigh around 95 lbs. and I'm 25 yrs old!! However, I'm only 5'1 and small framed. I don't look like a stick and I'm completely healthy. My weight according to my doctor is just right for my height and frame but I guess to this person I was breed wrong, LOL. My entire family is small so we must all be rejects. Just cracks me up that people make comments like that.
__________________
I My Lil Furballs!!
Pia Mojo ~ Trixie Murphy ~ Paisley Max
Dina_Nichole is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!