Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wnalegria If documentation was provided to you- that showed a YTCA member/members had not followed The YTCA guidlines and ethics what is your position. Ignore the situation or call the members attention to the problem.
If I am not mistkaken a YTCA member who is a judge did get a one year suspension and a fine of $2,500.00. The person in the household you spoke of for charging for the showing is the co-breeder of this line of yorkshire terriers. This person has lived in the home with the co- breeder for many years and is the co-founder of this line. I also think that the judge has his signature on the back of the checks and that the money was deposited in a bank account with his/her name on the account.
I would think that these two individuals would be aware of the AKC rules and regulations regarding these kind of matters. They filed an appeal and it was denied.
Bottom line is we all have gotten off track- this is Ricki's thread. There is no written requirement that you must state if your dog- is a Canadian, UKC, AKC , International or what ever type of Champion. The dog did earn the title.
When folks call to inquire about the puppies they will be provided the information that states what club/organization has awarded the title to the dog.
As to the number of points the dog was stated to have in AKC- I do not know- I was not involved in any of those conversations. |
I think I just made the statement that a judge was suspended because a member of his household showed a dog for compensation. Let's get away from the spite of this. You harp on this because of a lawsuit that has absolutely nothing to do with this whole issue so yes let's do keep this on track. A forum is not your personal arena. Handle your situation in the courts please.