[dskeeter1983]

Originally Posted by JeanieK

Well proof No, but there have been articles written by people who knew the origin. In 1891, P H Coombs, researched the origins, and talked to people who knew how the breed had been developed in the mid 1800's.

The book I'm talking about was written by Joan B Gordon, and she specifically mentions the maltese, and why people thought it had been included, but in actuality that if it was bred with the maltese, it was AFTER it had been established as a breed of it's own.

well you can swear by this joan lady and i will read the books i want to read , I will go with my opinion untill i am prooved wrong . And i have read over and over again that there is absolutley no proof of what breeds it took to get a yorkshire terrier and also the maltese terrier was around long before the yorkishire terrier breed and enough said I dont want to argue with you it goes like this you stand by your auther , and I will go by mine thank and no i do not want to have controversy over you and me not believing one another.
I am here to get opions not get told that i am stupid for stating somthing i read.