Quote:
Originally Posted by pstinard  Yikes. The good news is the article includes links to the peer-reviewed research articles cited in the article (behind a paywall, except for the abstracts, of course). The bad news is that the headline "Despite the Law, Here's Proof Your Pet Probably Doesn't Need This Vaccine" is misleading, since the articles cited don't prove that at all. In fact, that headline is almost criminal, and it wouldn't surprise me if the author changes it after receiving complaints from veterinarians. |
All of these types of articles tend to do this sort of thing. I agree it sounds criminal!