I like this test of quackery AKA pseudoscience. This too is a blog/opinion but I think it's point on!
1. Is the product or practice promoted as a “Major Breakthrough,” “Revolutionary,” “Magic,” or “Miraculous”?
2. Do the promotions try to simply elicit an emotional reaction rather than present clear information to help you make an informed decision about the product?
3. Is only anecdotal or testimonial evidence used to support claims of effectiveness?
4. Are claims made about scientific support without giving specific details?
Watch out for the following:
Few or no references given to original research studies. Studies done by only one researcher.
Studies done at obscure, unknown institutions.
Studies reported in small or virtually unknown journals.
Studies reported decades ago.
Studies that have not been repeated.
Funding of research by someone with a financial or professional stake in the results.
5. Is the information about the therapy or product being provided by a professional lacking in the proper credentials?
Warning Signs of Quackery and Fraud – Part 1 | Dr. Walt's Health Blog