View Single Post
Old 04-18-2015, 07:45 PM   #67
megansmomma
Donating YT 10K Club Member
 
megansmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: S. W. Suburbs of Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pstinard View Post
Of course, she provides no proof of this statement either. All of you people getting Nutriscan tests, are you prepared to fork over $280 annually for an unproven test? I don't have that kind of disposable income, myself.
I like this test of quackery AKA pseudoscience. This too is a blog/opinion but I think it's point on!

1. Is the product or practice promoted as a “Major Breakthrough,” “Revolutionary,” “Magic,” or “Miraculous”?
2. Do the promotions try to simply elicit an emotional reaction rather than present clear information to help you make an informed decision about the product?
3. Is only anecdotal or testimonial evidence used to support claims of effectiveness?
4. Are claims made about scientific support without giving specific details?
Watch out for the following:

Few or no references given to original research studies. Studies done by only one researcher.
Studies done at obscure, unknown institutions.
Studies reported in small or virtually unknown journals.
Studies reported decades ago.
Studies that have not been repeated.
Funding of research by someone with a financial or professional stake in the results.
5. Is the information about the therapy or product being provided by a professional lacking in the proper credentials?


Warning Signs of Quackery and Fraud – Part 1 | Dr. Walt's Health Blog
__________________
“Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.” Mark Twain
megansmomma is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!