YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community - View Single Post

whispersmom2 · 03-01-2006, 11:36 PM

I am trying once more to try to understand the postings. In #16you said to s/n ALL puppies for several gens to set the lines. The post said all puppies and there was no mention of keeping healthy pups back even though the parents had never thrown LS. I responded to the s/n ALL puppies as an overkill. That would leave none of your own puppies to work with in your lo=ines of healthy animals. You asked how could you control LS to some degree if you don't do that-meaning S/N ALL puppies for several gens.
Then in post #25 it reads "All the puppies I produce and not keep back for myself will be s/n" Now, there is mention of healthy puppies from healthy parents being kept back so obviously those would NOT be s/n.
Then in #37 the poster "someone said something about it being overkill to S/N healthy puppies from parents that have thrown LS pups". I specifically said "from parents who had NOT thrown LS"...I know this is a heated topic and I appreciate that fact. BUT, I also know that the truth is always the same but we can distort what we see as facts.
I am quite sure those members who have no interest in this issue are tired of reading these posts so I, for one, am saying "I have had enough and choose not to debate or discuss this further." I will wait til I can see a very well-translated copy of the regs from IBC and go from there. I DO NOT MEAN ABOUT LS (those dogs should NEVER be bred together again no matter what)but about breeding these Biewer Yorkshire terrier a la pom pons and the best program for them....
Adios!!!!

03-01-2006, 11:36 PM	#42
whispersmom2 Inactive Account Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: MD Posts: 2,985	I am trying once more to try to understand the postings. In #16you said to s/n ALL puppies for several gens to set the lines. The post said all puppies and there was no mention of keeping healthy pups back even though the parents had never thrown LS. I responded to the s/n ALL puppies as an overkill. That would leave none of your own puppies to work with in your lo=ines of healthy animals. You asked how could you control LS to some degree if you don't do that-meaning S/N ALL puppies for several gens. Then in post #25 it reads "All the puppies I produce and not keep back for myself will be s/n" Now, there is mention of healthy puppies from healthy parents being kept back so obviously those would NOT be s/n. Then in #37 the poster "someone said something about it being overkill to S/N healthy puppies from parents that have thrown LS pups". I specifically said "from parents who had NOT thrown LS"...I know this is a heated topic and I appreciate that fact. BUT, I also know that the truth is always the same but we can distort what we see as facts. I am quite sure those members who have no interest in this issue are tired of reading these posts so I, for one, am saying "I have had enough and choose not to debate or discuss this further." I will wait til I can see a very well-translated copy of the regs from IBC and go from there. I DO NOT MEAN ABOUT LS (those dogs should NEVER be bred together again no matter what)but about breeding these Biewer Yorkshire terrier a la pom pons and the best program for them.... Adios!!!!