[SirTeddykins]

Perhaps I did not make myself clear, apologies.


My point is, simply, that you seem to lack the ability to conform to standard breeding practices which are put forth by the registrar you claim supports your progeny, namely, the Kennel Club. Therefore, you are unlikely to sway anyone with your point of view which contravenes those basic practices and ethical guidelines. If you had not claimed that your puppies were KC registered, then we'd be having a different conversation.


As it stands, I am not attacking you or your intellect. You are quite interesting and have succeeded in engaging others in what is a very stimulating topic by including your points of view which you have backed up with evidence, albeit, one-sided.


I am quite happy to argue the merits of imprinting with you. My first undergraduate research project rejected Bowlby's theory re: imprinting and attachment on various grounds. I am also happy to spend my time with scientific evidence which refutes your assertion that socialization and habituation can only be achieved by the release of puppies from their initial environment before 12 weeks.


However, your reply to my query re: hypoglycemia risk during the time you are releasing your pups suggests that you would prefer that someone agree with you rather than question your decisions and evidence. I have replied to you in a way which shows why I cannot agree with you over the advice provided by an experienced breeder whose advice is contrary to your own.


My statements were not meant to offend you and I'm sorry you took it that way.