Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyjane  Sorry, I thought you had more of a vested interest in the forum. I am just surprised at the tossing around of the word unethical and also just astounded by all of this to be perfectly frank.
Nope, I think reading that list is somewhat important but do NOT think it is what a lot of people think it is. I believe it is about balance and what is good for my pups and I also believe that corn never killed a dog. I believe a lot of things that would astound you.  I believe that people who are highly educated in this field know more than most of us....and I believe that companies who spend more money on feeding trials and hiring vet nutritionists are companies I would rather deal with....I don't care for the ones who use their money to market their goods by using slick words. And, personally, I would never change my dogs' food immediately because I was mad at a company. You and I differ greatly...so that is obvious. You used the food for eight years and your pups did well on it....it's too bad you cannot believe that they would continue to do well. I do hope this change gives you 8 more uneventful years. I don't get a good feeling about it, but I hope I am wrong for you and your pups' sake.
What I find terrible here is NOT that you disagree, but the wording for something I believe is good for the community...but you are right you can go on and voice your opinions. I doubt it will feel better about all of this, but have at it Nancy. |
Not sure what you mean by vested interest? While I'm a contributing member, I make no money from this forum through any type of sales or services or anything else.
I didn't change the food immediately because I was mad at the company. I changed it because I realized I was feeding them a crap food, that had been a good food. I am mad at the company because they didn't inform consumers of the big change on the bag. Your logic doesn't make sense to me, yes, they did well on a certain food for 8 years, RC changed the food, so I no longer could keep the boys on the same food. What about that don't you understand? Why would I believe that they would continue to do well on a very poor substitute? Just because name Royal Canin is on the bag?