Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyjane  Frankly, I am stunned by some of these comments. I realize many of the people on YT believe they are nutritionists, but I have yet to meet one that I know for a fact IS ONE.
Here we have one and people are using language with her that I find offensive...especially the word unethical. I hardly would put RC on my list of people doing something unethical.
Anyone is free to read labels and spout what they think of them and it confounds me why people do not understand that it is more than reading an ingredient list.
I am sure that our new member will rise above it, but I simply HAD to comment because I think some of you are being a tad bit offensive. I won't argue the point....I am simply stating it so that you can do some soul searching...if you don't agree...well I guess have at it. As I said, she is a professional and sounds to me as if she can handle it. She also could be a VERY valuable member of this forum and I for one, am thrilled to see her here. |
My goodness if anyone ever commented on how you chose to answer, you'd read them the riot act. Don't you always say, if you don't like my answer report it to admin?
By the way, I also find it unethical that she is suggesting that the by-products they are using are more expensive than the chicken meal they use to use. Give me a break. Talk about Tap dancing. Some of you who are defending them them the most, NEVER used Royal Canin Formula for Yorkshire Terriers. Furthermore, it astounds me you don't think reading an ingredient list is important. I chose the food 8 years ago, because of the ingredients, not the name of the company.