View Single Post
Old 01-25-2006, 03:11 PM   #18
YorkieRini
Livin' La Yorkie Local
Donating Member
 
YorkieRini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow Yorkies
I will agree to the fact that we do sit in different corners here. I might have to sit in my corner alone.

You claim you want documented proof then how about producing some yourself... You make all your views perfectly clear but with what??? Show me & others here on this forum some proof to bring us into your corner. Three years of research you should have some links or references or something in black & white for all of us to view that we can all learn from. I have done my research as I am sure many others have. I can only stress that the Club you refer to as being a member of IBC still refers to the Biewers as "Yorkshire Terriers" why would this be???

I think the history of where this breed begins is extremely important and should never be disregarded.

I am not trying to start a debate I just would like you to share your wealth of knowledge with the rest of us and bring us all up to speed.
Touche'

I would be happy to provide the history and the standard but it's the same one that I believe you and I agree on..and others as well. I think it's all in how we interpret the history or standard.

Plain and simple..IMO we should only breed to the standard..NOTHING else! Here is the standard..truely says markings are specific..no mention of accepting b/g yorkies for breeding purposes.

http://www.ach-l.de/Biewer-Z%FCchter.htm
YorkieRini is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!