View Single Post
Old 11-10-2011, 10:26 AM   #35
DJDB
YT Addict
 
DJDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
Posts: 466
Default

My opinion on the subject is that a surgery that is to help the animal in some way is fine. I don't believe that mutilating an animal to "save" your furniture is humane or reasonable in any way and is the epitomy of selfishness. Just as parents know they must sacrifice some things because they have children (sleeping in on weekends, barf on the carpet, etc), a pet owner must realize that having a cat or dog or whatever means that maybe you don't have the nice furniture if you're not willing to take the time and effort to train your "friend". In my opinion, I would rather see someone re-home their cat or dog before mutilating it.

Our Ozzy had his tail docked by the breeder, but we would never have done that on our own. To me, anything done to make a dog or cat "standard" is like having cosmetic surgery done on your child because you think it should look more like the other kids. Kind of ridiculous when you give it some thought!!
__________________
David & Denise ... proud parents of Ozzy
DJDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!