Jp4m2 said:
"To the op, I’m sorry if your thread was taken into a direction which wasn’t what you where asking about. I thought you wanted differing opinions as to whether a person would or would not choose to use a chip. Since you had received many replies promoting its use I thought I would give another perspective. Personally, I would like to have any info I could get when it comes to the health of my pet so I offered other view. I didn’t expect my view to be selected for a debate as to why my view is incorrect in your thread.
Since this subject matter is for safety and not health I still stand by my view that we don’t have enough info as of yet to feel safe using a chip for *my* pets. This is a very personal decision we all have to make for our pets and I’m sure you’ll make the correct decision that is the right one for you and your pets…Good luck to you and again I’m sorry for side tracking your thread."
Jp4m2....you have nothing to apologize for. The OP asked for EVERYONES opinion.
Unfortunately, there are some here who feel Only their opinion is required when it comes to this particular topic, and if your opinion happens to be different, then you need to be pigeon-holed until you agree with them. They are a small minority, many of which have never been in a clinical R&D setting: most never truly understanding the mechanics, let alone the biological effects of RFID technologies. I, personally, am thankful for your invaluable research and effort into this topic.
From all of us on the other side, thank you, and keep up the good work. 