View Single Post
Old 07-20-2011, 04:54 PM   #16
Rhetts_mama
Donating YT 4000 Club Member
 
Rhetts_mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,959
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkiemini View Post
"Researchers in Detroit analyzed dust samples collected from 173 homes one month after a newborn baby was brought home to check allergen levels from hypoallergenic dogs and other breeds."

Research is my "schtix" and this study is flawed.
Who knows what those homes were like prior to bringing home a baby? Could have been a garbage dump. And what do they consider and allergic reaction. None of this is clear.

I know many, many folks who can tell you they have had dogs they could not tolerate and then found a breed they could. There are many factors involved and this study is too short and with too many variables to be accepted as the truth.

Gee, O.K., I need another glass of wine........
I agree it needs more study and a larger sample. However, it shouldn't be written off completely due to antecdotal evidence. While most people tend to associate allergies to just fur (because it's the most common) it's possible to be allergic to fur, dander (dead skin cells) and even saliva or any combination of those.
__________________
Don't get your knickers in a knot. Nothing is solved and it just makes you walk funny.
Rhetts_mama is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!