Quote:
Originally Posted by gidget529  I'm confused.  Did the juror not understand that the 3rd charge available for them to charge her w was "aggravated manslaughter" - death of child due to parent's negligence?
Did they only hear the first degree murder charge and tuned out the instructions on the second and third charges (2nd charge was "aggravated child abuse" - death of a child due to act of child abuse or attempted act of child abuse)?
They seemed to hear the 4th through 7th charges of 4 counts of lying to law enforcement. Do you think from what she said they didn't comprehend the different charges? (I didn't see the interview.) |
That's the way I translated her answers. She said initially all but 2 thought she was not guilty, she said this doesn't mean we thought she was innocent, but she says that they "caught George in a lie." So that means he may have been lying about his involvement. I'm not sure what lie they caught George in, I still don't think he had an affair with that woman, but at this point it would only be he said, she said. So the lady who sold her story to National Enquirer may have had a lot with to do with Casey getting off. I really don’t understand how much proof she thought she needed, but much more obviously than in the past. So in a way, technology has hurt us, because we know longer rely on common sense.