It's hard to come to terms with it all because it is so wrong on so many levels. So many lawyers and prosecutors today have said that today, in this CSI world, everyone thinks there is a smoking gun; a gotcha moment. These people wait for the CSI or SVU hoopla to occur, and when it does not they are at a loss. I really believe that is what the jury did, waited for the hoopla and fanfare and were confused when that didn't happen...and I also believe that they didn't understand the legal definition of reasonable doubt. It saddens me that this woman could lie, not come forward and say her daughter went missing, only came forward once her mother got involved and called the police, lied about everything, and deliberately got in the way with her lies when the police were finally searching for Caylee, and changed her story from "the nanny did it" to "she drowned in the pool", and these jurors didn't think anything was wrong with that.
The jury could have forced a mistrial allowing the prosecution a second chance to get their stuff together. No...they had to acquit her wrongly.
__________________  I  'ses my Teddie Monster |