NOTE: I underlined my responses within the quote to try and make it less confusing to read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Breezeaway  And all of this coming from a man who used to breed crossbred wolves!!!!!! Wonder what they use to say about you? Isn't that like calling the kettle black? Yeah..GRRRRR!!!! Was wondering when you would trot that out again (Hi, Cindy  ) Interesting enough, the dogs I USED to breed are now known as the American Tundra Shepherd. home WE are not trying to justify anything, All we are and have been saying is that the Parti yorkie is Just that, a yorkshire Terrier, it is not a crossbred.
You've been saying a lot more, but we'll leave that one alone  .
We love our parti yorkies just as much as anyone else. If we want to share with others when they ask how they came to be, we certainly have a right to tell them.
"Surrounded in mystery" (per your website) is not exactly telling us anything.
We are not members of the YTCA, We are not saying that they are the standard, We are not going to let you keep bad mouthing us and not say anything back.
Umm, well the YTCA *IS* the standard, as you would put it.
We ARE going to continue to breed and promote them anyway we see fit. If you don't like it then that is your problem not ours.
That much is obvious. Wonder what they'll look like down the road. No telling with your anything goes approach to breeding.
They are here and have been registered with AKC for 11 years. They are not going away, as a matter of fact in the next few years they will be everywhere.
CKC in Canada has accepted them. Europe enjoys us.
It is only in the United States, mainly the YTCA and mostly a few in here that it seems to bother the H*** out of.
So with that being said "IT'S TIME TO PARTI" |
Cast me as a 'hater' if you like. I really think they're adorable dogs but I'm sure that gets lost to the average person viewing this breeders disagreement. Disagreeing with a skewed view of history does not = hating the dog, nor the owners who love them.
What bothers me is creating 'facts' to support a 'history'. That's all I've addressed here, except for direct responses to your statements. Don't try to make it more than it is.