Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s Woah there Nellie. Calm down before you land yourself in the world of suspension! Whether or not the dog was impregnated purposely or not is to everyone to draw their own conclusions about, as I think most already have. Let's at least give the benefit of the doubt that the research has at least been done on the dog's history as far as parents (which I am sure have been examined?) and genetic defect. Granted, the dog IS almost 4 pounds...the bottom of the standard scale so it's not like it is one of the 2-3 lb tinies being bred--which I am sure this owner/breeder is well aware and NOT in support of? Take this one site posted on another thread: http://www.tinypuppiesforyou.com/index.html
...quite disturbing actually if you read it all. THIS, IMO, is sad. If this was an accidental case, I am sure that the comparison between the two should be quite different. Draw your own conclusion...my work here is done. I am going back to dance around that Boom-Boom Tree. |
I don't think there were any grounds for suspension. It just sounds like we were being duped, why would she xray the dog right before it's heat, and it is 2 years old, have her around a male, and not fixed? I disagree with you, it sounds to me like this breeder supports the breeding of tinies, she just knew so many people wouldn't agree with her. She said that there isn't a difference in breeding them or a bigger one.