Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhetts_mama  It's against the rules for any YT member to solicit for funds for a member. Only the rescue organizations are allowed to ask for financial help.
The OP stated that she had gained over 2 pounds. Would that happen with a false pregnancy?
Playing devil's advocate here, but why should the groomer be responsible for costs? If anyone other than the OP should be financially responsible, wouldn't it be the owner of the un-neutered male dog? Can a groomer reasonably be expected to keep two dogs apart while he/she is busy grooming other dogs? A tie can occur even if the dogs are separated by cages. It seems to me that ultimately it was the responsibility of the OP to not bring the dog in while she was in heat. It would also seem to me that it would be pretty difficult to prove that the tie happened at the groomers short of DNA testing all the potential father's that were there that day (not a cheap process). Like I said, Devil's Advocate. |
I don't think it should be anyone other than the OPers responsibility...She knew when she took her dog to the groomers that she was in heat, she told the groomer...she knew the risk and IMO to ask the groomer to watch her female was unreasonable when she is busy grooming others.
The un-neutered male owner shouldn't be responsible, he/she took there dog to be groomed not studded out.
I just believe the FULL responsibility should be the owner of the Female in heat giving all the information.
She knew her female was in heat!! It's the responsibility of the OP to keep her female in heat safely away from other dogs, and she didn't do that.