Oh pick me...
...because larger dogs don't have predominant health issues like smaller ones and if you study the real history of Yorkies the "standard" now is kind of a joke considering the first recorded Yorkies-they were all teapots...okay...sorry I couldn't help it............
see how easy passions run high and things get totally off the topic...
(....pssttttt I too believe Partis (tri colored or the appearance of white) a natural form of Yorkies historically speaking too and geez
please no one change this thread in that direction I'm just sayin' a comment like that can cause a whole thread to get all bittered and off the point that quickly...)
I get all cheesed off with this site being treated like YTCA Talk and not Yorkie Talk 
...okay I'll shush myself now....
...
promise (where's the smiley with hands over mouth or a zipper mouth-?)
But the reality of it is there is a vast amount of knowledge, sharing , and generally really fun stuff on here that...you just have to realize at some point you will tick off ppl or they will tick you off too...
I apologize in advance to the next person for the next thing I do to tick them off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil Sis  I also am a bit tired of the "debate" over small (say the 3 pounders) vs the over standard size. Why is it ok to brag you have a big dog (happy for you.. love the dog) but you are attacked if you have a small dog.. heaven help you if you say you want a small dog...aren't both out of standard ? Of course I am not talking about the tiny ting unhealthy dogs.. just a normal small yorkie.
All in all .... I love this site and I love the people |