You weren't playing devil's advocate to my post at all then. That was my point. People were implying that maybe she was some how a contributing factor to the illness and as such the breeder may not have been responsible for all the sickness (and all the vet bills). That is BS and I was just pointing that out. She did what a good owner would do and did NOT make the pup sick in any way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hartygirl  She pumped $1,800 into a BYB'ers program that is turning out sick pups, she funded these ladies and as such is helping them sell sick pups to other unsuspecting purchasers OR suspecting brokers. So while I agree she did not "make" the pup sick or cause its illness I am implying that she is now responsible for other pups becoming sick at the hands of the breeders she funded. |
Now to address this new post... Except she came on here and reported them as being a bad place to buy and I imagine put reviews up elsewhere. She is doing the responsible thing and warning others and is now, in fact, trying to PREVENT others from buying from them with these poor reviews. You are being very unfair by putting MORE guilt on her. Obviously she feels bad enough already about it and has admitted her mistake, as she should, but you don't need to put the weight of ALL their dogs on HER. That just isn't fair.