View Single Post
Old 01-06-2011, 03:36 PM   #87
Nancy1999
I ♥ Joey & Ralphie!
Donating Member
 
Nancy1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 25,396
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jencar98 View Post
Nancy, I don't care how you word it, by being against the breeding of partis, you are essentially against the dogs. If you had your way, partis would never be bred, so how can that be interpreted any other way than you are against partis?
I'm against the breeding for other things that are not standard, as well. For example, if a breeder decided to breed for a drooping ear, I would not approve of that either, I personally think the drooping ear is adorable and I'm not against those dogs, or any other dog that doesn't meet standard. I believe no breeder should breed for things that aren't standard. I think there is a clear difference. If someone loves a specific trait so much that they think standard should be changed, I believe they should find a breed whose standard incorporates this trait. I really think there are too many pets in this country now, and breeding should have a goal beyond producing pets. Some parti breeders seem to have a goal higher than just producing more pets, but I don't think they market their dogs as rare, and I think they do try to follow the rules of ethical breeding.
__________________
Nancy1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!