Originally Posted by lisaly  I've read through all of this, and I think the number ten or even five stands out because of what we've read here on YT by some about what makes someone a good breeder or what constitutes a show breeder. I may be incorrect, but I don't think those that are talking about the 23 dogs that don't make it to championship, are questioning the worth of those dogs. When I was looking for my dogs, I wasn't important to me to have a show quality dog , yet I looked for someone who I thought was breeding for the health and welfare of the pups. I did and still do want to have a dog that is healthy, has an excellent temperament, the Yorkie spunk and heart, and is a good, solid representation of the breed. If a breeder is doing health testing, evaluating their breeding stock, very carefully placing their pups into loving homes, and trying to breed to produce quality dogs, that's what is important to me, even to supply the pet market. They also need to spend good quality time to care for the needs of the pups, properly socialize them, and provide excellent vet care. I know there is an overpopulation problem, but if there aren't people to provide quality dogs to the pet market, won't more people turn to bybs and puppymills? I prefer to focus more on the ethics, knowledge, love, and passion of the breeder rather than the number of litters a year if all the other factors are carefully considered. I agree that the number can raise red flags, and it definitely should be looked into, but it is one of many factors that should be considered.
|