Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocoMilk  sometimes, it is better to look at the both sides point of view (breeder/buyer) instead of arguing your side only. I was just providing possible explanations on why a buyer might ask the price first because everyone here seemed to think ASKING PRICE FIRST = BUYER'S FIRST PRIORITY AND THEREFORE REJECT THE BUYER. (hence the baby example)
NOT THE CASE. and I'm sorry that you can't seem to understand beyond what you assume that every buyer should know, because not everyone can think like you. I never assumed less of any breeders or owners unless they ran a puppymill so I don't get why so many people attack one another here if one has done something that they think is "wrong". I just tried to give a different viewpoint since everyone is so one-sided, that is all.
anyway too long of a day today. just wanted to give my two cents but will withdraw from this thread now. |
[QUOTE=BamaFan121s;3332486]It's not a matter of being able to 'understand' the point you are trying to make. I can assure you, there is nothing wrong with my comprehension abilities. I personally, just don't agree with it. 
The debate is not due to our inability to understand. The debate is about someone that is inexperienced in interviewing future puppy owners, telling experienced breeders/exhibitors how to run their interviewing process. We've been doing this for many, many years, have encountered many personalities and have learned what phrases to listen for. And to put it bluntly, we have the final say on who we want to place our dogs with.