View Single Post
Old 07-26-2010, 04:49 AM   #643
Brooklynn
Donating YT 1000 Club Member
 
Brooklynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpstoybox View Post
They are separate breeds now...but that wasn't always the case.

"The Norwich and Norfolk Terriers were considered the same breed until 1964 when two different classification were created based on their ears. This separation occurred in England in 1964, but it took until 1979 for the U.S. to separate the breeds."

"Both the Norfolk and Norwich were born in the same litters at the time, and both prick eared and drop eared varieties emerged from the same whelp."

Norfolk Terrier Puppies Breeders Terriers

There are many other examples of a breed where standards were changed and variety classes were granted because breeders preferred a different look, size, color, or coat texture in their respected breeds.

The dachshund is another breed. It has three variety classes for coat.
1. smooth coat
2. wire coat
3. long coat

The beagle allowed breeders a variety class for 2 inch's of height. Both varieties share the same standard except for height.

We already talked about the cocker spaniel in this thread...they have 3 color variety classes. Parti being one of them. Their buffs, blacks, chocolates and roans sure haven't been damaged because of the parti being added to their standard.

Everyone knows the poodle come in three different sizes and are placed in three different show categories. They too have a parti that is AKC registered and can now show thier "multi-colored" poodle with the UKC.

The smooth and rough collie share the same standard except for coat and have their own variety class.

The Pembroke and the Cardigan Welsh corgi's were once the same breed...and were separated because some breeders wanted a docked tail.

These are just a few examples off the top of my head..I am sure their are plenty more.

The breeds listed here who allowed changes to the standard and added variety classes have not suffered because of it. Nor as someone falsely stated earlier in the thread...the original color's or trait were not bred out. Scare tactics are old school and boring. IMO that was a frightened and uneducated statement. The parti gene has been around for many, many years in other breeds, and they still have their original colors showing, still breeding true, and doing quite well.
Some of the breeds you mentioned are a varition of each other. I've had a pembroke and there are differences in the pembroke vs. the cardigan other than the tail. The pembroke is a smaller dog vs. the cardigan and a longer body ect....I love the pembroke over the cardigan and again my preference just as in yorkies. Of course they were one breed at one time but ONCE AGAIN....they are a seperate breed with their own standard.
I read somewhere that AKC is going to not add anymore varities to the breeds that are accepted . I need to find that out. If I heard correctly varities won't be added any longer....so if that's the case the Parti's can't be a variety to the standard yorkies...but again, I have to find that out.
Face it, the YTCA isn't going to accept the Parti's as a variety in my life time and AKC will honor the YTCA's recommendations.

Donna
__________________
Brooklynn's Yorkshire Terriers
Brooklynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!