[quote=BamaFan121s;3209163]
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpstoybox 
Looking past whether or not breeding partis is "ethical", and strictly for hypothetical purposes...On an argument based on what may or may not be considered a 'fault', how would it be any different than Championing a dog that may not have LS, but who may be a carrier? True, the dog may have a CH title, may make breedings more marketable, but what does it really matter if the dogs he produces have LS. Same concept, I suppose. Sure, the dog may not actually be a Parti, the CH title may make the pups more marketable, but what would it matter if the dogs produced are Parti and non standard.
That's kind of what I take the statment to mean.
|
Wow...now your reaching. Whether hypothetically or not...how can you even compare a coat COLOR to a life threatening condition? They are not even on the same page.
And the reasons for showing and finishing a traditonal colored yorkie that just happens to be a carrier...is no different then others showing and finishing their traditional's. It helps to validate a breeding program.