Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999  There have been many threads here on AKC suspensions, but for legal reasons those lists are no longer easily available. Too many sue-happy breeders. Yes, the AKC is a business; it's not a non-profit organization, like the YTCA, for example. The AKC definitely needs improving, and that's why I would like to see more than just large commercial breeders calling the shots, pet owners and reputable breeders should unite.
I don't know if you are aware of it, but the Canadian equivalent of the AKC, the Canadian Kennel Club is in serious financial trouble, and is asking it's members and breed clubs for donations. I seriously hope this doesn't happen with AKC. I imagine if they start hurting financially, they will have less money to do inspections, and when the USDA knows that a breeder is AKC registered, that aren't as likely to do frequent inspections, so it's a double whammy. |
The AKC has been assertive in gaining funding. Not all are in favor of the things that they do do. But they have to be profitable. I feel like are. There are many places for them to get money from.
They appear to be financially strong. However, think about all of the liters that aren't registered. Just 10 yrs ago the AKC & USDA were tied up w/ together. Every liter in a Puppymills was registered w/ the AKC. Now they don't get as much from them. Those new breed registers hurt their profits greatly. I say those as if there are on every corner. lol. Is there more than one?
If they struggle financially. I think they will open up to registering mixed breeds or something to capture the folks they're losing to the newer registry. Inspection isn't an option, it's the law. It seems like the mills would have to pay for them anyway, right? Are they free to the mills?