Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellie May  While Pfizer admits that theirs is the same, I don't see anything like that from other companies, so trying to figure out the difference. It looks theoretically possible that the three year have more adjuvants, but then giving only part of the adjuvants every year is not healthy either...
I may just have to start contacting companies.  |
yep that is what i would do and remember the bigger ones like pfizer are investigated more than the mom and pops as my client helps her clients get fda approval in US for international companies and she told me they only have so many inspectors and so they concentrate on the bigger companies as more money - you always follow the money so she told me to never take generic drugs for this reason as that is where most of the problems occur as they cannot check out every company not enough man power
I just posted how fda sent out a warning this week about metronidazole so that was pfizer so they watch the bigger companies alot more closely
also Crystal Jean said it is better to do 1/2 dhpp for tiny dogs than to split the vaccines due to adjuvuncts as we were talking about that 1lb dog a week ago and that was her response to do 1/2 the vaccine not separate it
I think Pfizer admits to it as it has had lawsuits against them for not disclosing properly to pet owners like things such as nsaids and the side effects of it.
But if we think of this logically why would a company make two different vaccines as that is very costly ?