View Single Post
Old 04-20-2010, 08:27 AM   #23
Brooklynn
Donating YT 1000 Club Member
 
Brooklynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjh View Post
Yelena, I was questioning the change to the code of ethics of the YTCA. There have been many discussions on this forum about the practice of 'enhancing' the color of the Yorkshire Terrier. The reason I went back to read the code of ethic was because someone asked me a question about what the code of ethics said about changing the appearance of a dog. I was surprised when I saw it had been changed. I don't want to go around quoting the YTCA code of ethics incorrectly. The reason I posted the question on here is because I know several members on here are members of the YTCA and they would be able to give a good explanation as to why it was changed and I received a good explanation.
I just have to say but enhancing can mean a variety of things and it seems you and this silk person are so hung up on the color part that it takes away from what one would consider something as in health and structure much more important and what structurely correct. Barb I don't want to offend you in anyway but enhancing a yorkie is so less serious than inserting steel testicals so a male would have one and surgically doing teeth to have a perfect bite...coloring is such of a lesser evil to me...

Donna
__________________
Brooklynn's Yorkshire Terriers
Brooklynn is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!