View Single Post
Old 03-08-2010, 06:09 PM   #17
RachelandSadie
No Longer a Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,748
Default

it floors me that there was anyone opposed to this and my reasoning is...aren't most phyco path killers linked back to some form of animal abuse in their early stages of life??? why wouldn't you punish as a fealony someone who hurts an innocent and defenseless animal. if you are cruel and crazy enough to harm a dog or cat, you are most likely crazy enough to go off on a human being or baby someday. why not put them away before more damage can be done??
RachelandSadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!