Quote:
Originally Posted by Neicy  Nancy, I think you might be thinking of this old tread below. This is what encouraged me to joing here and post mine as well. I pulled it up on a google search some how but noticed it was a couple years back. http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/gen...ed-yorkie.html
They seem to have the same thing going on too. So I have written members:
toto2
Aumbstore
rebeccag
And the reason for the DNA test is just to have a leg to stand on. Just as an ensight of having proof she is mixed or in fact she is just a genetic difference. I would hate to call the breeder a liar without proof. I guess it's just the principal of the matter.  |
Yes it was rebeccag that I remember doing the DNA testing, in her case the yorkie came back purebred. Here's her thread:
http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/gen...-chuahuas.html. Like I said before the CKC registry makes me leery, they will take the breeders word for the type of dog, and it background, where as the AKC requires strict record keeping.