This forum has long steered away from its original roots a few years back and became a political and social battle ground of some sort for whatever reason.
If I want to have my dog to have a family that will stay within my family I will do so within my rights.
And if you think you are being humane by trying to help stop growth of dog population around the world, why not expand the idea and promote the same idea for humans? Or is human life more important or more sacred in any way?? If so, explain why. Millions of unwanted children, humans roam this earth and pollute this planet. What is the difference between two animals like a dog and a human? One does more harm than the other, you figure it out which one it is. So please, lets not be selective about a global issue of overpopulation.
I don't know why you got offended, I clearly stated that I treat my dog with same respect I would treat any respectable human.
I would not leave my dog in the car while I go shop in a supermarket. Would you leave your children in a car while you shopped? No, A dog? Maybe. So why would someone leave the dog in a car and not a toddler? Is the toddler more important that a pup? If that is the case, we can clearly see what sort of person would let their dog reproduce aimlessly contributing dog dog population and which one would not. I know where I stand.
That double standard I will not understand, and frankly I don't have to.
May I remind you, since this is a free world and a free forum, we are more than welcome to state our opinions without being judgmental!
My apologies go out to the original poster for somehow contributing to diversion from the original topic.
