Thread: Designer Dogs
View Single Post
Old 12-07-2009, 08:52 AM   #86
cj125
Mia, Max and Moe's Mom
Donating Member
 
cj125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cha Cha View Post
There is plenty of research to support hybrid vigor as well. I myself, have seen and studied it. Since science is just that, science, you can find research to support any theory. Plain and simple. If you breed junk you will get junk. There is nothing you can do to change that, regardless of what you are breeding. Genetic defects (like undershot/overshot jaws just for example) will be passed on to at least some offspring if not all regardless if one parent is correct. There is a difference between disease and genetic defects and both need to be considered. Hybrid vigor is not going to change that. Hybrid vigor is about getting the best of two already exceptional animals. Now, if you breed two so so animals you will not get exceptional from that. Nice thought, but not going to happen. It is about dominant genes and recessive genes specific to each mating and health and genetic history of each animal involved. If people are working with a specific breeding program they know what they are doing. But, with all the hype over designer dogs and people trying to cash in on a fad with no regard to the history of the animal they are mating, it is going to be disasterous and the dog pays the price. In science, no one rule always applies to everything.
This is what the thread was all about!
__________________
Connie
Mia Max Moe
cj125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!