[Obie]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

First off I did not call you a liar. Second if you bought a Parti and it tested not a Parti then you didnt buy from a reputable breeder, must have forgot to do your homework.
As for the parti not tracing back to Friedheck, why would they? Darling and Fru were both grandkids of Streamglen richard, a grandson of Streamglen shaun and
Nikkos Orange blossom was out of Streamglen Milady, a granddaughter of Streamglen Shaun.

Schnee was born in 1984, the first so called Biewer. Why did Joan Gorden and Janet Bennett publish in a book in 1979 that says " "It is not unusual to find small white marks on one or more toes or a fine white line in the lower forejaw. These will not be visible as an adult. A large amount of white marks on the chest , paws, jaws, or skull, places a yorkie into a tri-color classification and it is very wise to guard against this possibility. Yorkshire terrier puppies can be born of colors that automatically deprive them of the necessary qualities to become the proper colors of the breed. They can be born all black: all tan: tan with black points; tri-color:black, white,and tan; all blue;bluish grey with tan points; and so remain or change to another shade of their newly born colors. These mismarked Yorkie puppies are not the result of the mis-alliances or throwbacks but are rather the net product of incorrectly inherited genes which have failed to activate the pigment glandular system to providing what they require to be in accord with the yorkshire terrier standard. Puppies incorrectly colored or marked should not be sold as rare, They should not be registered as Yorkshire terriers, but should simply be found a loving home If one cannot bring oneself to having them put down."

Now I would think a book that was written and talked about the tri colored yorkie being born long before one was even born in germany would take precedence...
We too have turned all the pedigrees and records over to AKC to prove that our dogs are Parti yorkshire terriers ,
And last If you plan on trying to solicit AKC to genetically test the parti yorki’s , Goodluck, they would have to test all Yorkshire terriers. And I'm sure AKC wouldn't appreciate the way you talk about them.

I am not worried about what AKC thinks. They only register dogs. They already know what we think.

Joan Gordens books states the following:


"It is not unusual to find small white marks on one or more toes or a fine white line in the lower forejaw. These will not be visible as an adult. A large amount of white marks on the chest , paws, jaws, or skull, places a yorkie into a tri-color classification and it is very wise to guard against this possibility. Yorkshire terrier puppies can be born of colors that automatically deprive them of the necessary qualities to become the proper colors of the breed. They can be born all black: all tan: tan with black points; tri-color:black, white,and tan; all blue;bluish grey with tan points; and so remain or change to another shade of their newly born colors. These mismarked Yorkie puppies are not the result of the mis-alliances or throwbacks but are rather the net product of incorrectly inherited genes which have failed to activate the pigment glandular system to providing what they require to be in accord with the yorkshire terrier standard. Puppies incorrectly colored or marked should not be sold as rare, They should not be registered as Yorkshire terriers, but should simply be found a loving home If one cannot bring oneself to having them put down."

Talking about the large amounts of white, no where does she indicate that the legs and belly are all white. Do you get it?

If you are going to put stock into what a person says, then you have to put stock into everything they say and not just what you want. She clearly said do not register these puppies as Yorkshire Terriers.