Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Obie;2893910
[I The parti is way beyond 5 generations.. and what does the standard of the parti have to do with the standard of the Biewer if they are, as you claim, two different breeds?[/I][/FONT]
It looks to have incorporated the standard of the Biewer, interesting?
] |
I am still not sure what you are saying or where you are going with this.
Who is going to be knocking at your door for what?
Who forced whos hand on what matter and for what reason?
What do the parti standards have to do with the Biewer?
The parti standards are set to be the same as those for the yorkie, because they ARE yorkies.
You come on here making all sort of wild unsubstantiated accusations on some thing that you obviously know nothing about. Your thoughts go off in all directions one time saying one thing and the next contradicting what you said, expecting the rest of us to know what is going on in your head. Talking about the AKC being 'vanished", the word is banished.
If you have a parti that did not test as a purebred, that does not mean that all partis were ill bred. My breeder is well known by the AKC and keeps impecable records.
If you think that the AKC is going to go back and do genetic testing on all the partis you are clueless as to how these things work. That would open the door for making every dog that they have registered be genetic tested. And I have no idea how they would do that with those ancestors that have passed on.
There are, no doubt, many many dogs that are registered as purebreds that are not purebred, and no one knows and no one really cares unless they are show dogs or if a buyer questions the parentage.
Still confused as to why it matters to you what is going on with the partis.
is it because they are AKC and the Biewers are not?
We know that this is going to take a long time and may not happen in our lifetime, but one has to start somewhere and bullying the AKC is probably not the best way to go about it.