Quote:
Originally Posted by YorkieMother  It is not defaming when it is public knowledge. That it is not your knowledge is not my fault. Go read what I have posted and the link at the start of this thread. AHA is public so are the rulings against him.
There is no alluding. it right there, all there you just do not want to see it.
Just like people for the longest time would not see millers.
What personal first hand knowledge do you have that he does not?
Have you ever trained with him?
Do you know anyone that was?
Do you know anyone that works with the dogs now he has?
Have you heard first hand accounts of events around his training?
JL |
The answer to all of the above is no. However, I am NOT going to make blanket statements about his methods - positive or negative. But I can tell you that I have gleaned some of his techniques and have put them into practice with my training and have had success. Puppy mills have nothing to do with this so let's not get off topic
I choose not to read the plethora of stuff that you link because there is no way to verify the data. Although I do recognize that the AHA does good, I also recognize that the organization has radicals that come up with some really crazy ideas.
I don't need any group to tell me what to think or what works for me. I am able to discern between healthy training and abuse. I am also intuned enough with my cirtters to know when they are stressed - and when I should push through and when I need to back off.