Quote:
Originally Posted by FlDebra  But if she did not even read them, why would she be upset or why would she think they were all telling her the same thing? Since I know that mine was positive, I feel I should give the benefit of the doubt to the other person who pm'd her that they may have been positive too. Why ASSUME anyone was negative?
You are right -- I do want people to know that I did not write anything like what is being suggested. I think it is horrible to jump on anyone about using the teacup term. I thought I was being helpful. I also think it is terrible for others to jump on someone without the facts. I think posting with hysterics saying they are "in tears" over something they "did not read" is wrong too. It just riles everyone up.
I could have just kept my mouth shut and not admitted that I pm'd her. But why do that? I had nothing to be ashamed of. I really thought people should know the truth about at least one of the two pms she got. If she got two? I have no idea bout the email as I don't know how anyone got her husband's email addy. |
I wouldn't worry about it. I totally see your point and you did NOTHING wrong but try to help, so let people take it the way they want.
You did a good thing
