Thread: Debarking Hooks
View Single Post
Old 06-24-2009, 11:21 AM   #23
k9trainer
Senior Yorkie Talker
 
k9trainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy1999 View Post
You make a neat little list, but if you consider each of these individually, they don't necessary have to be cruel. We breed dogs, yes, but good breeders understand how to do this successfully and not produce a genetically crippled offspring. Taking away a dogs sex organs is also not a cruel behavior, what I believe to be cruel, is having a male dog who has this incredible urge, and yet no way to satisfy it. Cutting off their tails, if done early, and with the correct procedure, I also consider not to be cruel. Your last reason of choosing when they die, is perhaps the kindest thing we do for animals that we don't do for humans. However, there are some breeders who recommend hitting the dog with a hammer to induce death.

Any of these things can be done cruelly, we all know breeders who breed 3 pounders who are at risk for cesareans, later joint problems, and worst. We all know breeders who breed a young dog before they even know if he has genetic ailments. I've read of breeders who perform neutering and spaying with no anesthesia, and of course all the byb's who don't know how to properly cut tails, and are too cheap to see a vet. These are the same people who often use debarking methods, and it usually involves a medal tube crammed down a dog's throat, very cost effective.

Even though the surgery she's choosing is a humane alternative, the result is the same, and the dog will know it can no longer bark, this is the part, I believe is inhumane. Neutered dogs, don't know what they're missing.

I would rehome a dog before I would consider debarking.
I would also rehome before even CONSIDERING debarking...I think it would be selfish not to.
k9trainer is offline  
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!