Thread: Byb
View Single Post
Old 05-11-2009, 09:16 PM   #10
QuickSilver
Thor's Human
Donating Member
 
QuickSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 5,929
Blog Entries: 31
Default

One thing that does not make a lot of sense to me is how "breeding to standard" and "breeding for health" are always mentioned together. I don't see why breeding for aesthetic qualities has anything to do with health checks. Obviously there are show dogs that can win competitions, yet still have terrible health problems.

I am probably a little biased because of my little blondie Thor, but personally, I like seeing all the variety of yorkie looks here. I would love to see more "off standard" yorkies and fewer threads about sick pups.

The most important things for me would be a breeder that (1) performed requisite health checks on the parents, (2) did everything possible to ensure the pups go to good homes, and (3) sell most or all dogs on a spay/neuter contract. Show looks are neither here nor there.

Just my opinion, and I'm willing to be proved wrong.
__________________
If you love something, set it free. Unless it's an angry tiger.
QuickSilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!