View Single Post
Old 04-07-2009, 10:26 AM   #96
QuickSilver
Thor's Human
Donating Member
 
QuickSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 5,929
Blog Entries: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaFan121s View Post
You are right...all breeds originated as the results of various breeds cross bred, Yorkies included. However, it was done with a purpose, with dogs being carefully selected and bred to enhance traits desireable for a specific role...not just to create more cute dogs. There was a standard developed and breeders made a coordinated effort to adhere to it...there was a set, goal 'type' they were trying to produce. That is not being done with the cross bred dogs that are being mass produced today.
However, the large majority of dogs now serve as companions today. Most dogs do not serve their original function. What's wrong with breeding dogs that are sweet, cute, smart, and good with families?

The best argument I've seen for breed standards is that you know what to expect when the puppy is grown (though you could do this pretty easily anyway, say, adopt an adult dog). There are a lot of good arguments *against* maintaining standard, primarily that you reduce the robustness of the gene pool. Imagine if instead of coat color, the primary characteristic of a yorkie was long life. I wonder if these little guys would have such marked problems with LP, liver shunt, hypoglycemia, etc.

Anyway, if you have healthy dogs that can mix well, such as poodles, malteses, yorkies, and s**tzus, I say, let 'em rip. Responsibly, of course.
__________________
If you love something, set it free. Unless it's an angry tiger.
QuickSilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!